Each of these is equally unlikely so, we can start from each of them and look for meaningful ways to prefer one over the other. 3, Creation, there was a designer involved in the creation of the universe. 2, Perpetual motion, the universe always was but never runs down. It is not surprising that well-known dictionaries have come to define Ethics as a synonym for Morality, stating that: ".lately, the distinction between the two terms is as substantial as a line drawn in the sand." But what if there is a method that, for the first time, allowed us to distinguish the ethical from the moral? A method that at a single glance would make us understand clearly and conclusively the crucial difference between moral values and ethical principles? Our contribution is to present this new method and offer, at the same time, an approach with a different structure to propose new answers to the existential problems that we are experiencing.īasically, there are three options for describing the origins of the universe 1, Something from nothing, in the beginning was nothing then, it exploded. In fact, we are so used to mixed arguments that we see any contradiction as “normal.” That is, as part of just a "different approach." There is so much written about Ethics and Morality today that it is literally impossible for someone to write something without contradicting someone else. These mixed-ups have generated misunderstandings, imprecise definitions, and even contradictory theories. And they can do it because they know they belong to the profane world, respecting the sacredness of the mentioned authors to whom they know they can not even remotely approach.Įven though there is a qualitative difference between the ethical and the moral, Ethics has been called Morality, and Morality has been called Ethics for too long. They argue, indeed they claim, that writing is life tout court. These pages do not choose writing over life. In the end, however, Semprun chooses writing, making him the teaching of Levi. Semprun's beautiful book, L'écriture ou la vie, comes to mind, but that book belongs to the sacred and these pages to the profane. Which is non-fiction because, while proceeding in a heuristic way, they do not support a thesis or more theses, but they tell a journey. Which is not poetry, not so much because of the absence of rhyme and rhythm, but because the writing of those drops is spread out. That they are not a novel, linear or circular as it is, because the episodes-events are dis-regarded. The episodes and events are there as we have cultivated them, we have subjected them to distillation-metabolization, which can also be an unwritten procedure, and finally, here are the drops that fall from the still.
I do not think there is anything clearer than what Rimbaud expressed with the example of quintessence.
Instead, it is what remains after using the metabolized raw material. It is not even a question of writing as metabolizing or processing mourning. This is not autobiography, because autobiography focuses on episodes and events.
0 kommentar(er)
